tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post8827740901610070398..comments2023-10-26T03:27:52.275-07:00Comments on Monterey John Photography - The Blog: RAW v. JPEG pt 4,722Monterey Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13114195139480244636noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post-40037881414386471872007-10-29T21:35:00.000-07:002007-10-29T21:35:00.000-07:00They look pretty close to me. I don't see a need f...They look pretty close to me. I don't see a need for the extra effort for such a small gain if any.Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09276132118456362393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post-10065644826062953562007-10-29T06:24:00.000-07:002007-10-29T06:24:00.000-07:00BTW, on my calibrated monitor, they look identical...BTW, on my calibrated monitor, they look identical.Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00794079257866559509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post-33395787218504679202007-10-29T06:23:00.000-07:002007-10-29T06:23:00.000-07:00That's always been my point. The little gain, if ...That's always been my point. The little gain, if you can see it, is not worth the time, effort, and disk space; however, it's a matter of personal preference. I've decided that neither is right nor wrong, they're just different and perhaps suited for different situations.<BR/><BR/>I would probably consider shooting RAW at a wedding. Not because of better image quality, but just in case I screwed up the white balance or auto didn't work so well. That said, though, I love my Expodisc and it does a fantastic job at getting accurate colors ... So, I would probably use JPG anyway. :-)<BR/><BR/>In the end, for me, without going the pixel-peeping route (100% crop), there is no difference. Can't tell a difference on the screen or on the print, then the rest is math! :-)Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00794079257866559509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post-49456036257619315922007-10-28T22:43:00.000-07:002007-10-28T22:43:00.000-07:00The images look considerably different in my brows...The images look considerably different in my browser (especially the leaves and ball). <BR/><BR/>FYI, not all browsers support image color profiles correctly (afaik, only Safari correctly supports them) so viewing them in a browser isn't really a good way to present them. Here's a reference about it: http://www.news.com/2100-1012_3-6191815.htmlhohonuulihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09429385784463734505noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5111937667893091668.post-26276626433010478822007-10-28T22:42:00.000-07:002007-10-28T22:42:00.000-07:00The images look considerably different in my brows...The images look considerably different in my browser (especially the leaves and ball). <BR/><BR/>FYI, not all browsers support image color profiles correctly (afaik, only Safari correctly supports them) so viewing them in a browser isn't really a good way to present them. Here's a reference about it: http://www.news.com/2100-1012_3-6191815.htmlhohonuulihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09429385784463734505noreply@blogger.com